President Obama may be selling
short the public’s appetite for climate action.
Or not. It all depends on how you
interpret the numbers.
To my ears, the second most
remarkable piece of President Obama’s 2nd inaugural address was his
words on climate mitigation:
We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations. Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires and crippling drought and more powerful storms. The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult. But America cannot resist this transition, we must lead it.
The events that have and have not
transpired since January have caused many pundits and environmentalists to
conclude that the President’s rhetoric on the climate is just that. The list
includes:
-
The EPA has not issued new rules regulating the
pollution of existing power plants
-
The President’s budget doesn’t present a
legislative strategy for addressing climate, but it does cut funding for the
EPA by 3.5%
-
Still no ruling on Keystone XL
Political writers love to talk about
how during a second administration, Presidents focus on cementing their
legacy. And President Obama seems to understand that action around climate change will figure prominently into his legacy. Yet, here we
are five months on and no action. What
gives?
In a Pew poll conducted in January of 2013, respondents were asked to prioritize Obama’s second term agenda. Taking action against global warming ranked
last (21 out of 21) on the list. The
percentage of people who view global warming as a serious problem currently
stands at 33%, a six-year low and a full 12 percentage points lower than 2006
(when Hurricane Katrina and An Inconvenient Truth were on people’s minds). Worst of all, only 19% of Republicans and 57%
of Democrats believe the earth is warming because of human activities.
Hard to blame President Obama and
his advisors for looking at the numbers and concluding, “the public isn’t
really behind us on this one.” With a
full legislative agenda, the recent gun control defeat, and the real possibility
of losing control of the Senate in 2014, political capital must be closely
guarded.
Yet, I can’t help but feel like a
huge opportunity is being missed here.
If you believe the science, which I’m sure Obama does, climate change is
only going to get worse. And as the
damage becomes increasingly apparent, we will begin looking back at our history
for scapegoats and heroes. All the
efforts the Obama administration has made to quietly address the systems
problems that facilitate our addiction to fossil fuels will be seen as half hearted
and incomplete.
Behind all the depressing data on
public opinion and climate change, there is reason for optimism. 71% of young people favor developing
renewable energy over expanding oil and gas drilling. The Yale Project on Climate Change Communication
estimates that a full 45% of the public is either alarmed or concerned about
climate change, far outweighing the estimated 21% who are doubtful or dismissive
of climate change.
It will be interesting to watch the
administration as it proceeds in the next year, before midterm elections and
the subsequent lame duck period. For the
sake of our future and the President’s legacy, I hope he chooses to act boldly,
in spite of the many obstacles that stand in the way of substantive climate
action.
Recent Comments